Slayer Crossbows
#1
Posted 04 January 2012 - 10:38 PM
#2
Posted 04 January 2012 - 11:20 PM
VIXEN, PHOENIX, VORTEX
#4
Posted 05 January 2012 - 09:19 AM
SZ350
#5
Posted 05 January 2012 - 10:36 AM
A while back I considered going into the crossbow business and obtained 2 of the Chace models, reputed to use Gordon limbs. One was a 225 draw that looks just like the Slayer except for the front foregrip. The other was a 150 draw compact model. Nice crossbow, well made, but vastly underpowered for hunting; could not get enough height adjustment from 3 different scopes and 1 red dot sight I tried.
The 225 had some problems of its own. When cocked, looking to the front of the 225 crossbow, the string lightly touched the left rail, but did not touch the right rail. I believe this was due to the limb pockets being a little wide, allowing a little too much play. Could be shimmed and would probably have been OK, but the thing was huge and I didn't like the size of it. Only shot it a couple of times and the rail scarred on the left side, then farther down on the right instead of wearing evenly; looked like the arrow wasn't travelling straight down the rail. I sent them both back, cured of wanting to be in the crossbow business, at least for now.
#6
Posted 06 January 2012 - 06:58 AM
Why do some want to just run to China and buy products from a catalog that are also sold to others and try and build a business around that? Whatever happened to hard work and innovation?
Today the crossbow industry has a lot of sharing. Just start taking a close look at some of the new models and you can see who is trading pieces parts. It’s like mix and match anymore, a regular buffet.
Be careful of the marketing smoke and mirrors and buy wise.
#7
Posted 06 January 2012 - 10:01 AM
xbowguy, on 06 January 2012 - 06:58 AM, said:
Be careful of the marketing smoke and mirrors and buy wise.
The Chace crossbows I looked at were EXACT clones of Excalibur, right up to not having the self-engaging safety on the 225, and having the string claws release from the top. As far as I'm concerned they were well-made in some areas but sloppy in some others. One thing I would NOT have cloned would have been the immense size of the 225 [I'm no runt at 5'11, 240, I just didn't like the size, it won't fit my stealthy style of hunting; others love the size I'm sure] and the low 150 poundage of the smaller one, but that's just me. The speed rating of 350fps for the 225 was obtained using arrows in the 350 grain class, unrealistic for hunting IMO, so the real-world speed would of course be less for many 20" arrows of around 450 grains. Didn't have a Chrony at the time so I didn't test them. The overall quality was the reason I opted not to have my name associated with these crossbows, AND the possibility of Excalibur initiating some sort of legal proceedings against dealers selling what are so obviously clones. Some of the clone dealers and "manufacturers" may live to regret some decisions.
If you lift up the skirts of some of the "new" crossbows, you might find some of them being made by Jindao of San Li Da Outdoors in China.
What's the appeal? $ $ saved in setup and labor, and $ saved in purchasing. A fully equipped Chace 225 including arrows, quiver, multi-ret scope [non IR], cocker, stringer, and one-year warranty [US facility] RETAILS for $399.99. All you need to buy extra are broadheads and a hunting license. An unsuspecting first-timer will think that's a bargain. The reason I personally considered selling imported crossbows was not money but because of the quality issues of some American-made crossbows whose mfrs demand 1st class prices for. I'm sick of being told that all crossbows have issues, there's no excuse for it. Some American mfrs just keep turning out 2nd-class quality crossbows as fast as they can because buyers are waiting. Little chance they're going to fix problems right now I think. American mfrs had better beware because IMO they are in EXACTLY the same situation American auto makers were in, in the '70s and '80s, and had better wake up before they get the very rude awakening of some foreign maker getting it right [BTW, you DO realize that if you're an American, Excal and Middleton are foreign, don't you?].
For now, it turns out the Chinese have some quality issues of their own, and bad quality is bad, no matter where it comes from. There are of course some American mfrs who make premium quality crossbows, but some are priced out of the range of many shooters today.
I don't remember who made the quote I learned in grade school so many years ago, but it's still appropriate today:
"There is hardly anything that some man can't make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and those who consider price alone are this man's lawful prey."
I can't say the the Slayer is Chinese in origin, but I can say it sho' do look like it.
#8
Posted 07 January 2012 - 02:57 PM
#9
Posted 07 January 2012 - 03:06 PM
randyxx75, on 07 January 2012 - 02:57 PM, said:
My guess is that they're posting the true speed with a hunting arrow, not a 350 grain arrow like other recurve companies. Just guessing though.
#10
Posted 05 February 2012 - 11:04 PM
#11
Posted 06 February 2012 - 07:19 AM
#12
Posted 06 February 2012 - 09:51 AM
SZ350
#13
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:35 PM
Edited by lastinline, 07 February 2012 - 07:40 PM.















