As always Duke, well stated.LOL ... "Not talking about in the west?" Do ethics somehow mutate once you cross the Mississippi??? Do lousy shooters from down east somehow transform into so may William Tells once they get to Wyoming?![]()
Why would a hundred yard shot in Connecticut be terrible but a guy taking the same shot in Oklahoma is okay with you? I don't follow the logic.
![]()
As Larry Flynt once said; Thats my right.,.As always Duke, well stated.
To add to that statement why are people weighing in on the natural inborn freedoms of others? I may not choose to take a shot at an animal or a target over a certain distance under less than ideal circumstances, but that’s my prerogative as an adult. What I have no tolerance for is other people who would try to affect my right to make those choices.
Makes ... perfect sense. But "sport" hunting is about challenges. The greater the challenge the more possibility of less-than-ideal results. It's an honor system. Each hunter is supposed to know his limitations. But, who ever gets better without leaving his comfort zone? Now "trophy fees" and "wounding fees" are predicated on those animals having monetary value. Wound a $5,000.00 animal and it's costing that outfitter $5,000.00 for an animal his next client/hunter would be paying for. 99% of hunting is just the cost of your license. A guy with equipment and experience to 50 yards takes a 60 yard shot. Is he unethical? Or, just stretching his skill to the next distance? I understand your point because I have "wounding fees" in most of the hunting I do. The fee is a possible media debacle. I haven't shot a deer passed 45 yards in about 5 years now...lol I HAVE shot them passed 100 yards ... with a rifle.I've said it before, and I'll say it again. If you were "penalized" in some way for wounding and not recovering your game, HOW FAR WOULD YOU SHOOT?
That's why there is a thing called wounding fees among trophy hunters.![]()
I'm just putting things in perspective. Asking a guy the question puts realistic limits on it. I don't see anyone answering the question. LOLMakes ... perfect sense. But "sport" hunting is about challenges. The greater the challenge the more possibility of less-than-ideal results. It's an honor system. Each hunter is supposed to know his limitations. But, who ever gets better without leaving his comfort zone? Now "trophy fees" and "wounding fees" are predicated on those animals having monetary value. Wound a $5,000.00 animal and it's costing that outfitter $5,000.00 for an animal his next client/hunter would be paying for. 99% of hunting is just the cost of your license. A guy with equipment and experience to 50 yards takes a 60 yard shot. Is he unethical? Or, just stretching his skill to the next distance? I understand your point because I have "wounding fees" in most of the hunting I do. The fee is a possible media debacle. I haven't shot a deer passed 45 yards in about 5 years now...lol I HAVE shot them passed 100 yards ... with a rifle.![]()
View attachment 250085 View attachment 250086
Ifyouve ever hunted out there, the shots are generally far. Maybe it was just the area iwas in but here in pa there is so much more brush and stuffLOL ... "Not talking about in the west?" Do ethics somehow mutate once you cross the Mississippi??? Do lousy shooters from down east somehow transform into so may William Tells once they get to Wyoming?![]()
Why would a hundred yard shot in Connecticut be terrible but a guy taking the same shot in Oklahoma is okay with you? I don't follow the logic.
![]()
Yeah, its jst getting insane. Like are they trying to go through three hippos, a giraffe, and a few hyenas?This one will never be settled, especially now with 500 fps whiz bang crossbows (and faster ones likely coming) getting so much attention. I expect 600 fps is being worked on now. For me, no thanks.
Very true, im just gonna stick in the 300s for fps. 35 max distance is ok with me. This is technically archery😉 500+ grain bolts...mmmmmIMO as speed increases so does distance .
100 may be pushing it but with a 505 60 yds is like a chip shot .
This goes straight to a point i have tried to make countless times.IMO as speed increases so does distance .
100 may be pushing it but with a 505 60 yds is like a chip shot .
There are so many factors that have a greater affect on arrows than bullets that I’d hesitate to call 100 a chip shot since all of the afore mentioned conditions have to be weighted by the shooter, and every dhooter really only answers to themselves. A friend and I hope to get our antelope hunt in the end of September. They repeatedly state to be ready for 60y, and if you draw blood, you’ve filled your tag regardless of recovery. I guess that would be a wound fee…100 may be pushing it but with a 505 60 yds is like a chip shot .