I’ll stick with rage hypos.
$27-$28 for one broadhead is stupid sounding. To me anyways for whitetail deer. Maybe alright for a moose.
$27-$28 for one broadhead is stupid sounding. To me anyways for whitetail deer. Maybe alright for a moose.
I am having great success with Rage Hypodermic 125 grain. Ravin doesn't offer a 125 grain offering and besides, why fix it if it ain't broke. I am curious to see how many guys use those and how they perform.I’ll stick with rage hypos.
$27-$28 for one broadhead is stupid sounding. To me anyways for whitetail deer. Maybe alright for a moose.
2.2" Blades, he says, Rich. Did ya miss your coffee this morn'n!? LOLNo mention of blade width and they aren't anything new. Two blade broadheads will work but there 3 and 4 blade options that work better. The lions share of the Ravin xbow sales happens in the big box retail stores and they already carry 3 or 4 suitable options. Not the best R&D time spent IMO.
Blunt, and to the point!! LOLAnyone buying thee broadheads should have their head examined.
Ha! I didn't miss anything. Have you looked at the broadheads? They are all 2 blade....2.2" Blades, he says, Rich. Did ya miss your coffee this morn'n!? LOLSorry, bud. Ya set yourself up for that one!!!
Ha! I didn't miss anything. Have you looked at the broadheads? They are all 2 blade....
Actually they clearly state on their web site that all three have a 2" cutting diameter, and do not need a retaining clip or band. The down side is they only come in 100 grain at the moment. Very similar to the Rage NC except they are rated for 450 FPS unlike the Rage NC at 420 FPSNo mention of blade width and they aren't anything new. Two blade broadheads will work but there 3 and 4 blade options that work better. The lions share of the Ravin xbow sales happens in the big box retail stores and they already carry 3 or 4 suitable options. Not the best R&D time spent IMO.
Cutting diameter is one element of the blade characteristic to be aware of. I'm not questioning that, the other is blade width or thickness. If these are .030 blades they are way too thin. Ideally .035 or even better, .040. No mention of it in anything I've read.Actually they clearly state on their web site that all three have a 2" cutting diameter, and do not need a retaining clip or band. The down side is they only come in 100 grain at the moment. Very similar to the Rage NC except they are rated for 450 FPS unlike the Rage NC at 420 FPS
Oh crap! LOL! I see what you were asking before...! Apparently I'm awake for the day now!!!Cutting diameter is one element of the blade characteristic to be aware of. I'm not questioning that, the other is blade width or thickness. If these are .030 blades they are way too thin. Ideally .035 or even better, .040. No mention of it in anything I've read.
So, let me use what we call in my profession a verbal or cognitive reframe. Are you saying, if someone buys or tries something you don't prefer that they are somehow less skilled than you are, because they have a different preference in Broad-heads? That is a bit self aggrandizing, don't you think? "Anyone buying [these] broadheads should have their head examined" ... Really?Anyone buying thee broadheads should have their head examined.