Crossbow Nation banner

Are pistol crossbows a viable hunting option?

1 reading
2.7K views 23 replies 13 participants last post by  JYates85  
#1 ·
Is a pistol crossbow really a viable hunting tool? Barnett is releasing a new pistol crossbow. What do you think? I think maybe small game hunting would be a blast with this thing!


 
#6 ·
This one looks interesting
When I saw 190 fps on Barnett’s description, i though probably the same dart the Ballista Bat shoots at 400.. I personally don’t shoot pistols well enough to worry about hunting with them anymore.
 
#12 · (Edited)
But for both versions I highly reccommend custom arrows. The accuracy of the arrows that come with the bow isn't really consistent.
Some batches are good, others are horrible (I had a weight difference of 22 grains, lightest to heaviest arrow in a pack of six).
That might be one factor in the video you watched.
You can easily get 2 inch groups at 60 yards with custom arrows.


Groups at 60 and 70 yards with the normal Bat (not the reversed version) from a member of a European board I'm also member of:

60 yards:

Image





70 yards:

Image
 
#14 ·
#17 ·
You would’ve thought the same thing when William Tell Archery was selling the bow under a different name too. Never happened though. I’m no patent lawyer, but perhaps the size difference, only able to shoot two-vaned arrows, and draw mechanism is what differentiates it enough?

Who knows? And then it may not be worth the time, as another company will rebrand the bow and Scorpyd will be chasing another lawsuit. It’s not as if Junxing cares about patent infringement.
 
#15 ·
@Suburban Hunter

Who would have to pay the royalties? The manufacturer or the rcompany that rebrands the bow and sells it as their own creation?
Ballista buys the Bat and Bat Reverse from Junxing (iirc). They are located in Shandong, China.
Don't know if the Scorpyd patent is valid in China - or if Junxing simply doesn't care.
Maybe they even pay royalties to Scorpyd... who knows - the reverse is way more expensive than the normal version.

And in case Junxing infringes the patent - how easy or difficult is it to sue a company in China?