Crossbow Nation banner

TP Ranger Master 100 vs EVO X Marksman Elite

1 reading
4.1K views 27 replies 8 participants last post by  ohlongarm  
Opinion from folks that have used the TP Range Master 100 and the EVO-X Marksman Elite.
I see a lot of the EVO X scopes for sale on the marketplace. Is there an issue with this scope?
Looking for decent low light uncluttered reticle. Scope will be on the new Venom X
My TP rangemaster is to me as good as it gets, dots and crosshairs doesn't get any better,the dots are for the most occuring distances encountered and the crosshairs are for when ( say when) the light gathering capabilities to me are exceptional as most of my deer were taken in very dark conditions the deers outline and reticles illuminated were perfect.Now thankfully I have great eyes at 20/15 both that may help, but all in all I love the scope.I personally wouldn't take the Evo -x over the one that came with the bow.
 
Last scope was stock Range Master Pro on my Fury 410. Have the stock scope on my WR Invader X4 is not lighted. Had two stock Barnett scopes. Can't recall the one I bought to replace the Barnett. The Range Master Pro is a pretty decent scope, I just prefer the single reticle on the Husky. Think the Huskemaw is clearer and better in low light. I have the Huskemaw on my new Venom X. Will be ordering another Venom X with same Huskemaw scope. First one was for the wife.
While the Husky is a great optic the turret clicks are a game changer for me ,way too loud a wary buck could hear those at 100 yards, easily on a still day. I can drive tacks with the Rangemaster all day,comes down to personal preferences.